Equipment Loan vs. Line of Credit for Seasonal Businesses
Two tools that get compared constantly but solve different problems. Here's how to tell which one actually fits.
Comparison
These solve two different problems
People compare these two like they're competing for the same job, but they usually aren't. An equipment loan is built for one thing: buying a specific piece of equipment you'll use for years, with a fixed payment that matches its useful life. A line of credit is built for the opposite situation: unpredictable, recurring costs where you don't know exactly how much you'll need or when.
For a seasonal business, that difference matters more than usual. A landscaping company doesn't need a new mower every March, but it does need cash for payroll and fuel before the first invoices get paid. A farm doesn't finance a combine every season, but it does need working capital between planting and harvest. Matching the tool to the actual problem is what keeps the cost down.
When an equipment loan is the right call
If you're buying a truck, a mower fleet, a walk-in cooler or anything with a multi-year useful life, an equipment loan (or lease) almost always beats using a line of credit for it. Rates are typically lower because the equipment itself secures the loan, terms can be matched to how long you'll actually use it, and you're not tying up a flexible credit line on something that isn't flexible at all.
When a line of credit is the right call
Payroll before your busy season starts. A repair bill that can't wait. Materials for a job that hasn't been invoiced yet. None of these have a fixed cost or a predictable timing, which is exactly what a line of credit is for: draw what you need, pay interest only on that amount, and repay it once revenue comes back in. Using an equipment loan for this kind of gap almost always costs more, since you'd be borrowing a fixed amount for a fixed term against a cost that isn't fixed at all.
A seasonal example
Take a landscaping company that does $400,000 a year, almost all of it between April and October. In February, before any client has been billed, it needs a new commercial mower ($18,000) and about $15,000 to cover payroll and fuel until invoices start coming in. The mower is a clear case for an equipment loan: fixed cost, multi-year use, predictable payment. The payroll gap is a clear case for a line of credit: it only exists for six to eight weeks, and the amount needed depends on how fast the season ramps up. Financing both the same way would mean either overpaying for the mower on a revolving line, or borrowing a fixed lump sum for a cash gap that might close faster than expected.
Using both together
Most established seasonal businesses end up running both at once: an equipment loan (or a few, staggered over different purchase years) for the assets they own outright, and a line of credit sized to their typical off-season gap. Lenders are generally comfortable with this combination, since the equipment loan doesn't compete with the line of credit for collateral, they're financing different things.
Worked example
Matching the tool right vs. wrong: the landscaping company, priced out
Same $18,000 mower, same $15,000 payroll gap, two ways to finance them.
| Matched (loan + line) | Everything on one equipment loan | |
|---|---|---|
| Mower ($18,000) | Equipment loan, 8.5% APR, 48mo | $33,000 combined, 8.5% APR, 48mo |
| Payroll gap ($15,000) | Line of credit, drawn ~6-8 weeks | |
| Interest cost | $3,312 (mower) + ~$250 (line) = $3,562 | $6,024 |
| Commitment length | 4 years (mower) + 6-8 weeks (line) | 4 years for the entire amount |
Line of credit interest estimated on a declining balance repaid within the season; equipment loan interest calculated with the standard amortization formula.
Financing everything as one equipment loan costs $2,462 more in interest, and it keeps the business making payments on a six-week cash gap for four full years after that gap closed. The mismatch doesn't show up on the approval - both structures get funded - it shows up in the total cost and in how long the debt actually sticks around.
FAQ
Common questions
Can I use a line of credit to buy equipment instead of an equipment loan?
You can, but it's usually more expensive over the full term. Lines of credit tend to carry higher rates than secured equipment loans, and using a revolving limit for a fixed, one-time purchase ties up credit you might need later for something genuinely unpredictable.
Does having an equipment loan hurt my chances of also getting a line of credit?
Not usually, as long as your overall debt load and cash flow support both payments. Lenders look at total obligations relative to revenue, so an equipment loan with a reasonable payment doesn't automatically block approval for a line of credit sized appropriately for your business.
Related